Personalized cardiovascular risk assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients using circulating molecular profiles and their modulation by TNFi, IL6Ri, and JAKinibs.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to: 1) analyze the inflammatory profile of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients, identifying clinical phenotypes associated with cardiovascular (CV) risk; 2) evaluate biologic and targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b-DMARDs and ts-DMARDs': TNFi, IL6Ri, JAKinibs) effects; and 3) characterize molecular mechanisms in immune-cell activation and endothelial dysfunction. PATIENTS & METHODS: A total of 387 RA patients and 45 healthy donors were recruited, forming three cohorts: i) 208 RA patients with established disease but without previous CV events; ii) RA-CVD: 96 RA patients with CV events, and iii) 83 RA patients treated with b-DMARDs/ts-DMARDs for 6 months. Serum inflammatory profiles (cytokines/chemokines/growth factors) and NETosis/oxidative stress-linked biomolecules were evaluated. Mechanistic in vitro studies were performed on monocytes, neutrophils and endothelial cells (EC). RESULTS: In the first RA-cohort, unsupervised clustering unveiled three distinct groups: cluster 3 (C3) displayed the highest inflammatory profile, significant CV-risk score, and greater atheroma plaques prevalence. In contrast, cluster 1 (C1) exhibited the lowest inflammatory profile and CV risk score, while cluster 2 (C2) displayed an intermediate phenotype. Notably, 2nd cohort RA-CVD patients mirrored C3's inflammation. Treatment with b-DMARDs or ts-DMARDs effectively reduced disease-activity scores (DAS28) and restored normal biomolecules levels, controlling CV risk. In vitro, serum from C3-RA or RA-CVD patients increased neutrophils activity and CV-related protein levels in cultured monocytes and EC, which were partially prevented by pre-incubation with TNFi, IL6Ri, and JAKinibs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, analyzing circulating molecular profiles in RA patients holds potential for personalized clinical management, addressing CV risk and assisting healthcare professionals in tailoring treatment, ultimately improving outcomes.

Integrative Clinical, Molecular, and Computational Analysis Identify Novel Biomarkers and Differential Profiles of Anti-TNF Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Background: This prospective multicenter study developed an integrative clinical and molecular longitudinal study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients to explore changes in serologic parameters following anti-TNF therapy (TNF inhibitors, TNFi) and built on machine-learning algorithms aimed at the prediction of TNFi response, based on clinical and molecular profiles of RA patients. Methods: A total of 104 RA patients from two independent cohorts undergoing TNFi and 29 healthy donors (HD) were enrolled for the discovery and validation of prediction biomarkers. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and 6 months after treatment, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated. Serum inflammatory profile, oxidative stress markers and NETosis-derived bioproducts were quantified and miRNomes were recognized by next-generation sequencing. Then, clinical and molecular changes induced by TNFi were delineated. Clinical and molecular signatures predictors of clinical response were assessed with supervised machine learning methods, using regularized logistic regressions. Results: Altered inflammatory, oxidative and NETosis-derived biomolecules were found in RA patients vs. HD, closely interconnected and associated with specific miRNA profiles. This altered molecular profile allowed the unsupervised division of three clusters of RA patients, showing distinctive clinical phenotypes, further linked to the TNFi effectiveness. Moreover, TNFi treatment reversed the molecular alterations in parallel to the clinical outcome. Machine-learning algorithms in the discovery cohort identified both, clinical and molecular signatures as potential predictors of response to TNFi treatment with high accuracy, which was further increased when both features were integrated in a mixed model (AUC: 0.91). These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: Our overall data suggest that: 1. RA patients undergoing anti-TNF-therapy conform distinctive clusters based on altered molecular profiles, which are directly linked to their clinical status at baseline. 2. Clinical effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy was divergent among these molecular clusters and associated with a specific modulation of the inflammatory response, the reestablishment of the altered oxidative status, the reduction of NETosis, and the reversion of related altered miRNAs. 3. The integrative analysis of the clinical and molecular profiles using machine learning allows the identification of novel signatures as potential predictors of therapeutic response to TNFi therapy.

Autonomous robots: a new reality in healthcare? A project by European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologist group.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Artificial intelligence appears as a potential revolution in the general process of medical training, disease diagnosis and treatment. A novel disruptive technology of the 21st century will be 'learner' robots from artificial intelligence systems able to use all the combination of the available knowledge in medical repositories to give the best standard of care. RECENT FINDINGS: The autonomy level of robots depends on three factors: the complexity of the task; the environment in which the robot operates, and the required level of human-robot interaction. Autonomous robots in healthcare may be classified in delivery, nurse, and surgical robots. The increasing capability of robots to perform independent actions and complex tasks raises responsibility and accountability issues in a wide variety of application domains. Ethical analyses of these issues are underway and are mostly oriented toward the development of ethical policies requiring a law frame on robotic autonomous behaviors. SUMMARY: Autonomous robots have the potential to improve current medical practice offering a more secure, reliable, and reproducible medicine. Many advancements are required for these new technologies to be fully integrated. Furthermore, the ethical implications of these technologies are yet to be evaluated.

Recomendaciones sobre el uso de metrotexato parenteral en enfermedades reumáticas / Recommendations for the use of parenteral methotrexate in rheumatic diseases

Objetivos. Desarrollar recomendaciones sobre el uso de metrotexato (MTX) parenteral en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas, fundamentalmente en la artritis reumatoide, basadas en la mejor evidencia y experiencia. Métodos. Se seleccionó un grupo de 21 expertos reumatólogos en el manejo de MTX. El coordinador generó 13 preguntas sobre el uso de MTX parenteral (perfiles de indicación, eficacia, seguridad, costo-eficacia y biodisponibilidad) para ser contestadas mediante una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Con base en las preguntas se definieron los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, y las estrategias de búsqueda (en Medline, EMBASE y la Cochrane Library). Tres revisores seleccionaron los artículos resultantes de la búsqueda. Se generaron tablas de evidencia. Paralelamente se evaluaron abstracts de congresos de la European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) y del American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Con toda esta evidencia el coordinador generó 13 recomendaciones preliminares que se evaluaron, discutieron y votaron en una reunión del grupo nominal con los expertos. Para cada recomendación se estableció el nivel de evidencia y grado de recomendación, y el grado de acuerdo mediante un Delphi. Se definió acuerdo si al menos el 80% de los participantes contestaron sí a la recomendación (sí o no). Resultados. La mayoría de la evidencia proviene de la artritis reumatoide. De las 13 recomendaciones preliminares se aceptaron 11 recomendaciones sobre el uso de MTX parenteral en reumatología. Dos no se llegaron a votar y se decidió no incluirlas, pero se comentan en el texto final. Conclusiones. Este documento pretende resolver algunos interrogantes clínicos habituales y facilitar la toma de decisiones con el uso de MTX parenteral

Objective. To develop recommendations for the use of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatic diseases, mainly rheumatoid arthritis, based on best evidence and experience. Methods. A group of 21 experts on parenteral MTX use was selected. The coordinator formulated 13 questions about parenteral MTX (indications, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness). A systematic review was conducted to answer the questions. Using this information, inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, as were the search strategies (involving Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library). Three different reviewers selected the articles. Evidence tables were created. Abstracts from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) were evaluated. Based on this evidence, the coordinator proposed preliminary recommendations that the experts discussed and voted in a nominal group meeting. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation were established using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and the level of agreement with the Delphi technique (2 rounds). Agreement was established if at least 80% of the experts voted yes (yes/no). Results. Most of the evidence involved rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 13 preliminary recommendations on the use of parenteral MTX were proposed; 11 of them were accepted. Two of the 13 were not voted and are commented on in the main text. Conclusions. The manuscript aims to solve frequent questions and help in decision-making strategies when treating patients with parenteral MTX

Recommendations for the use of parenteral methotrexate in rheumatic diseases. / Recomendaciones sobre el uso de metrotexato parenteral en enfermedades reumáticas.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the use of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatic diseases, mainly rheumatoid arthritis, based on best evidence and experience. METHODS: A group of 21 experts on parenteral MTX use was selected. The coordinator formulated 13 questions about parenteral MTX (indications, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness). A systematic review was conducted to answer the questions. Using this information, inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, as were the search strategies (involving Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library). Three different reviewers selected the articles. Evidence tables were created. Abstracts from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) were evaluated. Based on this evidence, the coordinator proposed preliminary recommendations that the experts discussed and voted in a nominal group meeting. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation were established using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and the level of agreement with the Delphi technique (2 rounds). Agreement was established if at least 80% of the experts voted yes (yes/no). RESULTS: Most of the evidence involved rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 13 preliminary recommendations on the use of parenteral MTX were proposed; 11 of them were accepted. Two of the 13 were not voted and are commented on in the main text. CONCLUSIONS: The manuscript aims to solve frequent questions and help in decision-making strategies when treating patients with parenteral MTX.

Incidence, associated factors and clinical impact of severe infections in a large, multicentric cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of severe infection and investigate the associated factors and clinical impact in a large systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) retrospective cohort. METHODS: All patients in the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) who meet ≥4 ACR-97 SLE criteria were retrospectively investigated for severe infections. Patients with and without infections were compared in terms of SLE severity, damage, comorbidities, and demographic characteristics. A multivariable Cox regression model was built to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for the first infection. RESULTS: A total of 3658 SLE patients were included: 90% female, median age 32.9 years (DQ 9.7), and mean follow-up (months) 120.2 (±87.6). A total of 705 (19.3%) patients suffered ≥1 severe infection. Total severe infections recorded in these patients numbered 1227. The incidence rate was 29.2 (95% CI: 27.6-30.9) infections per 1000 patient years. Time from first infection to second infection was significantly shorter than time from diagnosis to first infection (p < 0.000). Although respiratory infections were the most common (35.5%), bloodstream infections were the most frequent cause of mortality by infection (42.0%). In the Cox regression analysis, the following were all associated with infection: age at diagnosis (HR = 1.016, 95% CI: 1.009-1.023), Latin-American (Amerindian-Mestizo) ethnicity (HR = 2.151, 95% CI: 1.539-3.005), corticosteroids (≥10mg/day) (HR = 1.271, 95% CI: 1.034-1.561), immunosuppressors (HR = 1.348, 95% CI: 1.079-1.684), hospitalization by SLE (HR = 2.567, 95% CI: 1.905-3.459), Katz severity index (HR = 1.160, 95% CI: 1.105-1.217), SLICC/ACR damage index (HR = 1.069, 95% CI: 1.031-1.108), and smoking (HR = 1.332, 95% CI: 1.121-1.583). Duration of antimalarial use (months) proved protective (HR = 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999). CONCLUSIONS: Severe infection constitutes a predictor of poor prognosis in SLE patients, is more common in Latin-Americans and is associated with age, previous infection, and smoking. Antimalarials exerted a protective effect.

[Penile necrosis as clinical presentation of systemic Calciphylaxis: Report of two cases and bibliographic review]. / Necrosis peneana como síntoma dubut de calcifilaxis sistémica análisis de 2 casos y revisión de la literatura.

OBJECTIVE: Calciphylaxis is a potentially lethal syndrome reported mainly in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. Etiopathogenesis remains unclear and there is much controversy regarding optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Penile necrosis as a disease presentation is extremely rare. We report two clinical cases treated in our center and perform an evidence review. METHODS: Clinical data was obtained from both patients and an evidence review was performed on PubMed under the criteria "penile necrosis" and "Calciphylaxis". RESULTS: Both patients underwent partial penectomy due to severe penile necrosis. After surgery both patients received treatment with sodium thiosulfate (STS) 20mg in every hemodialysis session. Both patients showed stabilization of necrotic lesions. DISCUSSION: The same way that biopsying the ischemic lesions produced by Calciphylaxis is discussed and even misadvised, the role of aggressive surgery as first line therapy might be uncertain specially with the raising of new specific drugs such as sodium thiosulfate (STS) that have shown efficacy stopping disease progression.

Eficacia y seguridad de golimumab añadido a fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad en artritis reumatoide. Resultados del estudio GO-MORE en España / Efficacy and safety of golimumab as add-on therapy to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of the GO-MORE study in Spain

Objetivos: Analizar la eficacia y la seguridad de golimumab en los 140 pacientes incluidos en España en la parte 1 del estudio GO-MORE, un estudio multinacional en artritis reumatoide (AR) activa a pesar del tratamiento con distintos fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME). Pacientes y métodos: Los pacientes recibieron golimumab 50 mg subcutáneo una vez al mes durante 6 meses. El criterio de valoración principal fue el porcentaje con respuesta DAS28-VSG EULAR buena o moderada tras 6 meses de tratamiento. Resultados: Se incluyó a 140 pacientes. El 76,4% tenía enfermedad muy activa (DAS28-VSG > 5,1). El 76,4% estaba tomando metotrexato, el 40,0% otros FAME en monoterapia o combinación, y el 65,0% esteroides. Al mes 6, el 82,9% de los pacientes logró una respuesta EULAR buena o moderada, el 41,4% alcanzó baja actividad y el 30,7% remisión. El porcentaje de pacientes con respuesta al mes de la primera dosis administrada fue del 69,3%. La eficacia fue similar en pacientes tratados con metotrexato u otro FAME, distintas dosis de metotrexato, con/sin esteroides o que habían fallado a uno o más FAME. El golimumab fue bien tolerado y el perfil de seguridad fue coherente con estudios previos. Se comunicaron acontecimientos adversos graves en 11 pacientes (7,9%). Conclusión: La adición de golimumab 50 mg subcutáneo mensual a distintos FAME en pacientes con AR activa deparó una respuesta moderada o buena a los 6 meses en el 82,9%. La respuesta comenzó a observarse tempranamente, ya al inicio del mes 2, tras una única dosis de golimumab (AU)

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab in the 140 patients included in Spain as the first part of the GO-MORE trial, a multinational study involving patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with different disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients and methods: The patients received subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg once a month during 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percentage of individuals with a good or moderate EULAR DAS28- ESR response after 6 months of treatment. Results: A total of 140 patients were included. Of these, 76.4% had very active disease (DAS28-ESR > 5.1). 76.4% were taking methotrexate, 40.0% other DMARDs in monotherapy or combined, and 65.0% received corticosteroids. After 6 months, 82.9% of the patients showed a good or moderate EULAR response, 41.4% had low disease activity, and 30.7% were in remission. The percentage of responders one month after the first dose was 69.3%. The efficacy was similar in patients treated with methotrexate or other DMARDs, with different methotrexate doses, with or without corticosteroids, or in subjects who had failed one or more DMARDs. The response to golimumab was observed from the first dose. Golimumab was well tolerated and its safety profile was consistent with the findings of previous studies. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 patients (7.9%). Conclusion: The addition of subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg once a month to different DMARDs in patients with active RA yielded a moderate or good response after 6 months in 82.9% of the cases. The response was observed early, from the start of the second month, after a single dose of golimumab (AU)

Necrosis peneana como síntoma debut de calcifilaxis sistémica. Análisis de 2 casos y revisión de la literatura / Penile necrosis as clinical presentation of systemic Calciphylaxis: Report of two cases and bibliographic review

OBJETIVOS: La calcifilaxia es un síndrome potencialmente letal descrito primordialmente en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica en diálisis. La etiopatogenia es incierta y existe controversia en cuanto al manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico. La necrosis peneana como manifestación de esta enfermedad es extremadamente infrecuente. Analizamos dos casos clínicos tratados en nuestro centro y realizamos una revisión de la literatura. MÉTODOS: Se recogió la información clínica de ambos pacientes y se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en Pubmed bajo los criterios de búsqueda "penile necrosis", "penile calciphylaxis", "sodium thiosulfate" y "systemic calciphylaxis". RESULTADOS: Ambos pacientes fueron sometidos a penectomía parcial debido a extensa necrosis peneana. Tras la misma, iniciaron un régimen de Tiosulfato de Sodio 20 mg i.v. durante sus sesiones de hemodiálisis. En ambos pacientes se apreció estabilización del proceso isquémico. CONCLUSIÓN: La biopsia de las lesiones en la necrosis isquémica de pene, por sospecha de calcifilaxis sistémica, es controvertido. Igualmente, el papel de la cirugía agresiva de entrada puede ser discutible; más aún con la aparición de nuevos fármacos específicos, como el Tiosulfato de sodio, que parecen ser eficaces en la estabilización de las lesiones

OBJECTIVE: Calciphylaxis is a potentially lethal syndrome reported mainly in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. Etiopathogenesis remains unclear and there is much controversy regarding optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Penile necrosis as a disease presentation is extremely rare. We report two clinical cases treated in our center and perform an evidence review. METHODS: Clinical data was obtained from both patients and an evidence review was performed on PubMed under the criteria "penile necrosis" and "Calciphylaxis". RESULTS: Both patients underwent partial penectomy due to severe penile necrosis. After surgery both patients received treatment with sodium thiosulfate (STS) 20mg in every hemodialysis session. Both patients showed stabilization of necrotic lesions. DISCUSSION: The same way that biopsying the ischemic lesions produced by Calciphylaxis is discussed and even misadvised, the role of aggressive surgery as first line therapy might be uncertain specially with the raising of new specific drugs such as sodium thiosulfate (STS) that have shown efficacy stopping disease progression

Comprehensive description of clinical characteristics of a large systemic lupus erythematosus cohort from the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) with emphasis on complete versus incomplete lupus differences.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by multiple organ involvement and pronounced racial and ethnic heterogeneity. The aims of the present work were (1) to describe the cumulative clinical characteristics of those patients included in the Spanish Rheumatology Society SLE Registry (RELESSER), focusing on the differences between patients who fulfilled the 1997 ACR-SLE criteria versus those with less than 4 criteria (hereafter designated as incomplete SLE (iSLE)) and (2) to compare SLE patient characteristics with those documented in other multicentric SLE registries.RELESSER is a multicenter hospital-based registry, with a collection of data from a large, representative sample of adult patients with SLE (1997 ACR criteria) seen at Spanish rheumatology departments. The registry includes demographic data, comprehensive descriptions of clinical manifestations, as well as information about disease activity and severity, cumulative damage, comorbidities, treatments and mortality, using variables with highly standardized definitions.A total of 4.024 SLE patients (91% with ≥4 ACR criteria) were included. Ninety percent were women with a mean age at diagnosis of 35.4 years and a median duration of disease of 11.0 years. As expected, most SLE manifestations were more frequent in SLE patients than in iSLE ones and every one of the ACR criteria was also associated with SLE condition; this was particularly true of malar rash, oral ulcers and renal disorder. The analysis-adjusted by gender, age at diagnosis, and disease duration-revealed that higher disease activity, damage and SLE severity index are associated with SLE [OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.08-1.20 (P < 0.001); 1.29; 95% CI: 1.15-1.44 (P < 0.001); and 2.10; 95% CI: 1.83-2.42 (P < 0.001), respectively]. These results support the hypothesis that iSLE behaves as a relative stable and mild disease. SLE patients from the RELESSER register do not appear to differ substantially from other Caucasian populations and although activity [median SELENA-SLEDA: 2 (IQ: 0-4)], damage [median SLICC/ACR/DI: 1 (IQ: 0-2)], and severity [median KATZ index: 2 (IQ: 1-3)] scores were low, 1 of every 4 deaths was due to SLE activity.RELESSER represents the largest European SLE registry established to date, providing comprehensive, reliable and updated information on SLE in the southern European population.

Efficacy and safety of golimumab as add-on therapy to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: results of the GO-MORE study in Spain.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab in the 140 patients included in Spain as the first part of the GO-MORE trial, a multinational study involving patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with different disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients received subcutaneous golimumab 50mg once a month during 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percentage of individuals with a good or moderate EULAR DAS28-ESR response after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included. Of these, 76.4% had very active disease (DAS28-ESR>5.1). 76.4% were taking methotrexate, 40.0% other DMARDs in monotherapy or combined, and 65.0% received corticosteroids. After 6 months, 82.9% of the patients showed a good or moderate EULAR response, 41.4% had low disease activity, and 30.7% were in remission. The percentage of responders one month after the first dose was 69.3%. The efficacy was similar in patients treated with methotrexate or other DMARDs, with different methotrexate doses, with or without corticosteroids, or in subjects who had failed one or more DMARDs. The response to golimumab was observed from the first dose. Golimumab was well tolerated and its safety profile was consistent with the findings of previous studies. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 patients (7.9%). CONCLUSION: The addition of subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg once a month to different DMARDs in patients with active RA yielded a moderate or good response after 6 months in 82.9% of the cases. The response was observed early, from the start of the second month, after a single dose of golimumab.

Documento práctico para el uso de abatacept subcutáneo / Practice guidelines for the use of subcutaneous abatacept

Objetivo: Revisar la evidencia clínica sobre abatacept subcutáneo (sc) y emitir recomendaciones con objeto de aclarar su uso en reumatología. Método: Un panel de expertos reumatólogos resumió de forma objetiva las pruebas existentes sobre el mecanismo de acción, el modo de uso, la eficacia y la seguridad de abatacept sc y desarrolló un documento sobre el uso de este fármaco en situaciones concretas, previa revisión de la bibliografía. Resultados: El abatacept sc sustenta su eficacia y seguridad en 7 ensayos clínicos, 3 doble ciego, 3 abiertos y uno mixto, en los que se compara la administración sc frente a la iv de abatacept, se estudia el posible impacto sobre la inmunogenicidad, el efecto de sustituir la vía iv por la sc en pacientes que previamente venían recibiendo abatacept iv, la monoterapia y la no inferioridad frente a adalimumab. No se han encontrado diferencias significativas frente a abatacept iv ni en cuanto a la eficacia ni en cuanto a la seguridad. El desarrollo de abatacept sc ha permitido un estudio complementario al del iv, con lo que el perfil del mismo queda más definido. Conclusiones: Se trata de un documento práctico como complemento a la información en ficha técnica. En resumen, el abatacept sc se presenta como un fármaco eficaz y seguro y, por lo tanto, como una alternativa más para utilizar entre los múltiples tratamientos con que cuenta hoy en día el reumatólogo. Además, cuenta con la ventaja de ser el único agente biológico que se puede administrar por vía iv y sc, lo cual puede facilitar su uso en determinados pacientes (AU)

Objective: To review the clinical evidence on subcutaneous (sc) abatacept and to formulate recommendations in order to clear up points related to its use in rheumatology. Method: An expert panel of rheumatologists objectively summarized the evidence on the mechanism of action, practicality, effectiveness, and safety of abatacept sc and formulated recommendations after a literature review. Results: The efficacy and safety of abatacept sc was studied in 7 clinical trials, 3 double-blind, 3 open, and one mixed, with the following endpoints: comparison against abatacept iv, impact on immunogenicity, effect of replacing iv by sc, abatacept sc in monotherapy, and non-inferiority to adalimumab. No significant differences were found between sc and iv abatacept on efficacy or safety. The development of sc abatacept has allowed a complementary study to the iv, formulation, thus making the abatacept profile better defined Conclusions: This is a practical document to supplement the summary of product characteristics. In summary, abatacept sc is presented as an effective and safe drug and, therefore, as an alternative for use within the broad armamentarium the rheumatologist has to treat RA. It also has the advantage of being the only biological agent that can be administered iv and sc which can facilitate its use in certain patients (AU)

Practice guidelines for the use of subcutaneous abatacept.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical evidence on subcutaneous (sc) abatacept and to formulate recommendations in order to clear up points related to its use in rheumatology. METHOD: An expert panel of rheumatologists objectively summarized the evidence on the mechanism of action, practicality, effectiveness, and safety of abatacept sc and formulated recommendations after a literature review. RESULTS: The efficacy and safety of abatacept sc was studied in 7 clinical trials, 3 double-blind, 3 open, and one mixed, with the following endpoints: comparison against abatacept iv, impact on immunogenicity, effect of replacing iv by sc, abatacept sc in monotherapy, and non-inferiority to adalimumab. No significant differences were found between sc and iv abatacept on efficacy or safety. The development of sc abatacept has allowed a complementary study to the iv, formulation, thus making the abatacept profile better defined. CONCLUSIONS: This is a practical document to supplement the summary of product characteristics. In summary, abatacept sc is presented as an effective and safe drug and, therefore, as an alternative for use within the broad armamentarium the rheumatologist has to treat RA. It also has the advantage of being the only biological agent that can be administered iv and sc which can facilitate its use in certain patients.

El uso de abatacept en artritis reumatoide: revisión de la evidencia y recomendaciones / Abatacept use in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence review and recommendations

Objetivo. Revisar la evidencia clínica sobre abatacept y emitir recomendaciones con objeto de aclarar su uso en Reumatología. Método. Un panel de expertos reumatólogos resumió de forma objetiva las pruebas existentes sobre el mecanismo de acción, modo de uso, eficacia y seguridad de abatacept y emitió recomendaciones de uso en situaciones concretas, previa revisión de la bibliografía. Se estableció el nivel de evidencia de las pruebas y el grado de apoyo de dichos datos a las recomendaciones emitidas. Resultados. El documento presenta 21 enunciados resumen de la evidencia encontrada o recomendaciones sobre abatacept (14 enunciados y 9 recomendaciones). El nivel de evidencia es superior a 2b según la escala de Oxford del Centro de Medicina Basada en la Evidencia en 14 ocasiones. El grado de apoyo de las recomendaciones es A en 2 recomendaciones, C en una y D en el resto. Se consideró importante realizar recomendaciones precisamente en los aspectos con menor grado de evidencia. Conclusiones. Se trata de un documento práctico como complemento a la información en ficha técnica (AU)

Objective: To review the clinical evidence on abatacept and to formulate recommendations in order to clear up points related to its use in rheumatology. Method: An expert panel of rheumatologists objectively summarized the evidence on the mechanism of action, practicalities, effectiveness and safety of abatacept, and formulated recommendations following a literature review. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation was established. Results: The document presents 21 statements focused on evidence or recommendations on abatacept (14 evidence summaries and 9 recommendations). The level of evidence was 2b or higher according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scale on 14 occasions. The degree of the recommendation was A in two recommendations, C in one, and D in the rest. It was considered important to make recommendations on aspects with lower levels of evidence. Conclusions: This is a practical document to supplement the summary of product characteristics (AU)

Abatacept use in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence review and recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical evidence on abatacept and to formulate recommendations in order to clear up points related to its use in rheumatology. METHOD: An expert panel of rheumatologists objectively summarized the evidence on the mechanism of action, practicalities, effectiveness and safety of abatacept, and formulated recommendations following a literature review. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation was established. RESULTS: The document presents 21 statements focused on evidence or recommendations on abatacept (14 evidence summaries and 9 recommendations). The level of evidence was 2b or higher according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scale on 14 occasions. The degree of the recommendation was A in two recommendations, C in one, and D in the rest. It was considered important to make recommendations on aspects with lower levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This is a practical document to supplement the summary of product characteristics.

Reumatismo fibroblástico. Estudio de un paciente / Fibroblastic rheumatism. Case report

No disponible

Consenso SER sobre la gestión de riesgo del tratamiento con terapias biológicas en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas / Consensus statement of the spanish society of rheumatology on risk management of biologic therapy in rheumatic patients

Objetivo: Dado el creciente uso de las terapias biológicas en distintas enfermedades reumatológicas, y la importancia de la gestión de riesgo de las mismas, desde la Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER) se ha impulsado el desarrollo de recomendaciones basadas en la mejor evidencia posible. Estas deben de servir de referencia para reumatólogos e implicados en el tratamiento de pacientes en tratamiento o en los que se quiere indicar la terapia biológica independientemente de su enfermedad de base. Métodos: Las recomendaciones se emitieron siguiendo la metodología de grupos nominales. El nivel de evidencia y el grado de recomendación se clasificaron según el modelo del Center for Evidence Based Medicine de Oxford y el grado de acuerdo se extrajo por técnica Delphi. Se utilizó toda la información de consensos y guías de práctica clínica previas. Resultados: Se realizan recomendaciones sobre la gestión del riesgo del uso de las terapias biológicas en pacientes con enfermedades reumática. Incluyen la gestión del riesgo de la indicación, gestión del riesgo antes de iniciar el tratamiento, gestión del riesgo durante el seguimiento, actitud ante acontecimientos adversos, y actitud en situaciones especiales. Conclusiones: Se presentan las recomendaciones SER sobre la gestión del riesgo del tratamiento con terapias biológicas (AU)

Objective: Due to the increasing use of biologic therapy in rheumatic diseases and the importance of its risk management, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) has promoted the development of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference to rheumatologists and those involved in the treatment of patients who are using, or about to use biologic therapy irrespectively of the rheumatic disease. Methods: Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on systematic reviews. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through a Delphi technique. Evidence from previous consensus and clinical guidelines was used. Results: We have produced recommendations on risk management of biologic therapy in rheumatic patients. These recommendations include indication risk management, risk management before the use of biologic therapy, risk management during follow-up, attitude to adverse events, and attitude to special situations. Conclusions: We present the SER recommendations related to biologic therapy risk management (AU)

[Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on risk management of biologic therapy in rheumatic patients]. / Consenso SER sobre la gestión de riesgo del tratamiento con terapias biológicas en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the increasing use of biologic therapy in rheumatic diseases and the importance of its risk management, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) has promoted the development of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference to rheumatologists and those involved in the treatment of patients who are using, or about to use biologic therapy irrespectively of the rheumatic disease. METHODS: Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on systematic reviews. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through a Delphi technique. Evidence from previous consensus and clinical guidelines was used. RESULTS: We have produced recommendations on risk management of biologic therapy in rheumatic patients. These recommendations include indication risk management, risk management before the use of biologic therapy, risk management during follow-up, attitude to adverse events, and attitude to special situations. CONCLUSIONS: We present the SER recommendations related to biologic therapy risk management.

Análisis farmacoeconómico de Metoject® en el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide en España / Pharmacoeconomic analysis of Metoject® in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Spain

Objetivos. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido comparar la eficiencia de utilizar el metotrexato subcutáneo (Metoject®) con respecto al metotrexato oral en el manejo de pacientes con AR en España. Métodos. Se ha realizado un análisis coste-efectividad/utilidad del tratamiento de la AR temprana utilizando un modelo de Markov. El modelo ha permitido estimar la efectividad a largo plazo del tratamiento de la AR en función de los datos de la literatura y de la opinión de expertos y combinarlo con información de los costes en España. El análisis se ha realizado desde la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud, utilizando un horizonte temporal de 5 años y de toda la vida del paciente. Todos los costes se expresaron en euros del año 2009 y se ha utilizado una tasa de descuento del 3%. Resultados. La razón de coste (solo costes farmacológicos) por año de vida ajustado por calidad (AVAC) ganado con Metoject® fue de 25.173–35.807€ a los 5 años y de 19.056–25.351€ para toda la vida. Al tener en cuenta los costes directos de la AR se observó que el coste-efectividad a los 5 años fue de 29.682–42.175€/AVAC ganado y para toda la vida fue de 22.514–29.848€/AVAC ganado. Conclusiones. Los costes adicionales de Metoject® respecto a metotrexato oral se verían compensados por su mejora en efectividad, expresada en términos de AVAC, revelando que Metoject® podría ser un tratamiento costeefectivo para la AR en el Sistema Nacional de Salud según el umbral asumido en España (AU)

Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and economic consequences of using subcutaneous methotrexate (Metoject®) with respect to oral methotrexate in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Spain. Methods. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare early treatment of RA using a Markov model. The model allowed us to estimate long term efficacy of RA treatment based on data from the literature and expert opinion, and to combine this data with costs of managing RA in Spain. The perspective of the study was from the National Health System point of view, using a time horizon of 5 years and patient lifetime. All costs were expressed in 2009 euros and a 3% discount rate was applied. Results. The cost (only pharmacologic costs) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with Metoject® went from 25,173 to 35,807€ at 5 years and from 19,056 to 25,351€ for patient lifetime. When direct costs in RA treatment were considered, it was observed that cost-effectiveness at 5 years went from 29,682 to 42,175€/QALY gained, and for patient lifetime from 22,514 to 29,848€/ QALY gained. Conclusions. Additional costs of Metoject® with respect to oral methotrexate would be offset by their improved effectiveness, expressed in QALY, showing that Metoject® could be a cost-effective treatment option for RA in the Spanish Health System assuming a spanish threshold (AU)